|
it
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DFS Namespaces with offline filesHello,
is it supported to mark DFS namespace folders to be available offline? What happens when a user moves to a different site and the referals are redirected to a different (may be not synced) folder? Client is XP and Vista. thank you very much. ondrej. Works perfectly.
As far as the client is concerned it is just a path, resolved by the DFS client service. Of course if you have two replicas out of sync then the synchronisation of what is up to date or not will be different, but that is a problem with the synchronisation, not with Offline files. Anthony, http://www.airdesk.com Show quoteHide quote "Ondrej Sevecek" <ondrej.sevecek@community.nospam> wrote in message news:uEk2H5u$JHA.1376@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > is it supported to mark DFS namespace folders to be available offline? > What happens when a user moves to a different site and the referals are > redirected to a different (may be not synced) folder? > > Client is XP and Vista. > > thank you very much. > > ondrej. > > so what happens, when this is the setup:
SMB physical shares out of sync: \\srvA\shareA\fileX version 1 \\srvB\shareM\fileX version 2 combined into DFSN hierarchy: \\domain.local\DFS\share --> \\srvA\shareA, \\srvB\shareM klient accesses \\domain.local\DFS\share\fileX and marks it as available offline while reffered to srvA. what happens when the users is switched to the srvB's referal? ondra. Show quoteHide quote "Anthony [MVP]" <anth***@no-reply.com> wrote in message news:8E92E7E5-4F43-43E2-A3EE-E88E45D0DB13@microsoft.com... > Works perfectly. > As far as the client is concerned it is just a path, resolved by the DFS > client service. > Of course if you have two replicas out of sync then the synchronisation of > what is up to date or not will be different, but that is a problem with > the synchronisation, not with Offline files. > Anthony, > http://www.airdesk.com > > > "Ondrej Sevecek" <ondrej.sevecek@community.nospam> wrote in message > news:uEk2H5u$JHA.1376@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Hello, >> >> is it supported to mark DFS namespace folders to be available offline? >> What happens when a user moves to a different site and the referals are >> redirected to a different (may be not synced) folder? >> >> Client is XP and Vista. >> >> thank you very much. >> >> ondrej. >> >> Hello ondrej,
Thank you for posting here. Q: is it supported to mark DFS namespace folders to be available offline? Generally speaking, we can enable available offline for DFS namespace share folders. However, there is some limitation on the scenario. For the limitation of using DFS, Offline Files, redirected folder, please refer to the section "Q. Can I use DFS with Offline Files and redirected My Documents folders?" in the following link. Distributed File System: Frequently Asked Questions http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/dfsfaq.mspx Support for DFS-based shares for Offline Files http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=262845 Q: What happens when a user moves to a different site and the referrals are redirected to a different (may be not synced) folder? A: There could be cause some inconsistence of the shared folder on that server in the new site the users move to. Hope it helps. David Shen Microsoft Online Technical Support
Other interesting topics
domain name issue
Server with NICs in different VLANs: Separation 2 networks at the same time My Documents Folder access How to maintain server login password Windows 2003 Srv - Losing Def Gateway LAC Properties Oddity New Windows 2008 Server domain connection problem DNS Scavenging questions Pre-Windows 2000 Name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||