Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Browsing not working accross VLANs

Author
9 Jun 2009 2:58 PM
marcin
I have been trying to solve this problem for a few days and am getting
desperate. Here is the set-up:
. two VLANs with a router between them, no filtering, no ACLs
. one domain with two clustered PDCs (Win2003), running WINS
. VLAN A contains servers, VLAN B a couple of test workstations

What works:
. I can see all the registrations on the WINS servers, all servers and
workstations which have WINS IP addresses defined are there
. from workstations in VLAN B I can map drives on the servers in VLAN A

What does not work:
. from the workstation on VLAN B I cannot run 'browstat gm' (getting "Unable
to get Master: access denied", and "Master name cannot be determined from
GetAdapterStatus") and browstat sts ("Unable to query browser statistics:
2184")
. from any of the servers in VLAN A I cannot see the workstations in VLAN B.

I am testing an application which requires the workstations to show up in the
windows browser in order to deploy clients. I would really appreciate tips on
how to further troubleshoot this issue. Thanks.

Regards
Marcin

Author
9 Jun 2009 3:12 PM
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
marcin <u52472@uwe> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> I have been trying to solve this problem for a few days and am getting
> desperate. Here is the set-up:
> two VLANs with a router between them, no filtering, no ACLs
> one domain with two clustered PDCs (Win2003), running WINS
> VLAN A contains servers, VLAN B a couple of test workstations
>
> What works:
> I can see all the registrations on the WINS servers, all servers and
> workstations which have WINS IP addresses defined are there
> from workstations in VLAN B I can map drives on the servers in VLAN A
>
> What does not work:
> from the workstation on VLAN B I cannot run 'browstat gm' (getting
> "Unable to get Master: access denied", and "Master name cannot be
> determined from GetAdapterStatus") and browstat sts ("Unable to query
> browser statistics: 2184")
> from any of the servers in VLAN A I cannot see the workstations in
> VLAN B.
>
> I am testing an application which requires the workstations to show
> up in the windows browser in order to deploy clients. I would really
> appreciate tips on how to further troubleshoot this issue. Thanks.
>
> Regards
> Marcin

You have a WINS server in each location, yes? Is the WINS partnership
working?
Are all your drivers up to date? click for free checkup

Author
9 Jun 2009 6:43 PM
marcin
Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN A. That
partnership is working. I have no WINS server on VLAN B. According to MS WINS
Best Practises, one WINS server is sufficient for a small routed network...
The reason I introduced WINS was that we don't have DCs on all VLANs and I
have to make browsing work between VLANs.

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>> I have been trying to solve this problem for a few days and am getting
>> desperate. Here is the set-up:
>[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> Regards
>> Marcin
>
>You have a WINS server in each location, yes? Is the WINS partnership
>working?
Author
9 Jun 2009 7:52 PM
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
marcin <u52472@uwe> wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN
> A. That partnership is working. I have no WINS server on VLAN B.
> According to MS WINS Best Practises, one WINS server is sufficient
> for a small routed network... The reason I introduced WINS was that
> we don't have DCs on all VLANs and I have to make browsing work
> between VLANs.

It's been a while since I had to to anything like this, but I think you do
want a WINS server on VLAN_B. Could be I'm wrong. What traffic is permitted
between VLAN segments?

Show quoteHide quote
>
> Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
>>> I have been trying to solve this problem for a few days and am
>>> getting desperate. Here is the set-up:
>> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>> Regards
>>> Marcin
>>
>> You have a WINS server in each location, yes? Is the WINS partnership
>> working?
Author
10 Jun 2009 12:03 AM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<lanwe***@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23mmpY8U6JHA.5828@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> marcin <u52472@uwe> wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN
>> A. That partnership is working. I have no WINS server on VLAN B.
>> According to MS WINS Best Practises, one WINS server is sufficient
>> for a small routed network... The reason I introduced WINS was that
>> we don't have DCs on all VLANs and I have to make browsing work
>> between VLANs.
>
> It's been a while since I had to to anything like this, but I think you do
> want a WINS server on VLAN_B. Could be I'm wrong. What traffic is
> permitted between VLAN segments?

He can actually do it either way, but if only using one, and all machines on
both sides of the fence are using the one WINS box, the fence will
experience extra weight with the resolutions requests.

But of course, all traffic (no barb wires) needs to allowed across the
fence.

Show quoteHide quote
:-)
Author
9 Jun 2009 8:24 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"marcin" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message news:975ac64a2946c@uwe...
> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN A.
> That
> partnership is working. I have no WINS server on VLAN B. According to MS
> WINS
> Best Practises, one WINS server is sufficient for a small routed
> network...
> The reason I introduced WINS was that we don't have DCs on all VLANs and I
> have to make browsing work between VLANs.
>

Are all machines in both VLANs using this WINS server in their IP
properties?

Are there any firewall rules blocking NetBIOS or any other type of traffic
in the VLAN config?

--
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSA Messaging, MCT
Microsoft Certified Trainer
ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org

For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.

"Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right
things." - Peter F. Drucker
http://twitter.com/acefekay
Author
10 Jun 2009 12:09 AM
Bill Grant
Show quote Hide quote
"Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org>
wrote in message news:#$tG#AU6JHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "marcin" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message news:975ac64a2946c@uwe...
>> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN A.
>> That
>> partnership is working. I have no WINS server on VLAN B. According to MS
>> WINS
>> Best Practises, one WINS server is sufficient for a small routed
>> network...
>> The reason I introduced WINS was that we don't have DCs on all VLANs and
>> I
>> have to make browsing work between VLANs.
>>
>
> Are all machines in both VLANs using this WINS server in their IP
> properties?
>
> Are there any firewall rules blocking NetBIOS or any other type of traffic
> in the VLAN config?
>
> --
> Ace
>

   Ace put his finger on the essential bit. It is not how many WINS servers
you have, but how everything is set up. What really matters is that you have
a WINS database which contains all the possible master browsers.

   In a small network one WINS server is sufficient, but all machines must
register with this WINS server. If you have a multiple WINS servers, they
must all replicate to give you a database containing all the possible browse
masters.

    The master browsers use WINS to get the IP addresses of other master
browsers so that they can communicate directly with them. Once you segment
your network you can't rely on broadcasts any more for communication between
master browsers.

    You don't need a DC in each segment/VLAN. You don't even need a server.
A workstation can act as a segment master browser. You do need at least one
DC in the network. Only a DC can merge the lists from the segment master
browsers into a network-wide browse list.
Author
10 Jun 2009 1:33 PM
marcin via WinServerKB.com
There are no ACLs on the router. In our test environment we have two DCs and
WINS are installed on both of them, all that on VLAN A. The number of users
is small, so one server can certainly handle the traffic. Are there any
specific packets I should be looking for in network traffic captures on both
VLANs in order to determine what is failing? Thank you very much for your
help.

Bill Grant wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>>> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN A.
>>> That
>[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Are there any firewall rules blocking NetBIOS or any other type of traffic
>> in the VLAN config?
>
>   Ace put his finger on the essential bit. It is not how many WINS servers
>you have, but how everything is set up. What really matters is that you have
>a WINS database which contains all the possible master browsers.
>
>   In a small network one WINS server is sufficient, but all machines must
>register with this WINS server. If you have a multiple WINS servers, they
>must all replicate to give you a database containing all the possible browse
>masters.
>
>    The master browsers use WINS to get the IP addresses of other master
>browsers so that they can communicate directly with them. Once you segment
>your network you can't rely on broadcasts any more for communication between
>master browsers.
>
>    You don't need a DC in each segment/VLAN. You don't even need a server.
>A workstation can act as a segment master browser. You do need at least one
>DC in the network. Only a DC can merge the lists from the segment master
>browsers into a network-wide browse list.

Author
10 Jun 2009 1:37 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
news:9764a44de8ebc@uwe...
> There are no ACLs on the router. In our test environment we have two DCs
> and
> WINS are installed on both of them, all that on VLAN A. The number of
> users
> is small, so one server can certainly handle the traffic. Are there any
> specific packets I should be looking for in network traffic captures on
> both
> VLANs in order to determine what is failing? Thank you very much for your
> help.


WINS uses port TCP 42. Is that being blocked?

Ace
Author
10 Jun 2009 1:46 PM
marcin via WinServerKB.com
The workstations I want to see in the browser on VLAN A all have both WINS
servers entered in the Advanced configuration. There is no filtering on the
router, which connects the two VLANs.

Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your reply. I have two WINS servers on VLAN A.
>> That
>[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> The reason I introduced WINS was that we don't have DCs on all VLANs and I
>> have to make browsing work between VLANs.
>
>Are all machines in both VLANs using this WINS server in their IP
>properties?
>
>Are there any firewall rules blocking NetBIOS or any other type of traffic
>in the VLAN config?
>

Author
10 Jun 2009 2:47 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
news:9764c0427d93a@uwe...
> The workstations I want to see in the browser on VLAN A all have both WINS
> servers entered in the Advanced configuration. There is no filtering on
> the
> router, which connects the two VLANs.

Sometimes certain ports are blocked by default in some routers.

Ace
Author
10 Jun 2009 3:28 PM
Phillip Windell
Hey Folks,..

If it were me, I would just use a single WINS and forget it.  Yes, the
queries would go over the router but I doubt those really amount to much
load.  But then,...I am me,...and I and using two,..hmm,...I'll have to
think about that one for a while.

Two WINS are fine but it is not always so great either. Putting both in a
Clients TCP/IP Settings doesn't always mean the client will actually use
both,...the "failover" to the second WINS is probably no more consistant or
reliable than it is with having two DNS entries.  Then with two WINS you
would probably want a Push/Pull Partnership setup with them and I have seen
that not always work so smoothly either.  Then you don't really need the
redundancy with WINS like you do DNS because it just isn't that critical,...
nor does it even really provided redundancy quite like DNS with AD
replication does anyway,..I've probably seen as much inconsistancy and
conflicts between two WINS databases as I have agreement.   And lastly a
single WINS will easly and fairly quickly rebuild it self if lost,....I have
deleted corrupt databases and they rebuilt themselves quite quickly.


--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


Show quoteHide quote
"Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org>
wrote in message news:uQCKjpd6JHA.1424@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
> news:9764c0427d93a@uwe...
>> The workstations I want to see in the browser on VLAN A all have both
>> WINS
>> servers entered in the Advanced configuration. There is no filtering on
>> the
>> router, which connects the two VLANs.
>
> Sometimes certain ports are blocked by default in some routers.
>
> Ace
>
>
>
Author
10 Jun 2009 4:48 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
Show quote Hide quote
"Phillip Windell" <philwind***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ORldeAe6JHA.5780@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hey Folks,..
>
> If it were me, I would just use a single WINS and forget it.  Yes, the
> queries would go over the router but I doubt those really amount to much
> load.  But then,...I am me,...and I and using two,..hmm,...I'll have to
> think about that one for a while.
>
> Two WINS are fine but it is not always so great either. Putting both in a
> Clients TCP/IP Settings doesn't always mean the client will actually use
> both,...the "failover" to the second WINS is probably no more consistant
> or reliable than it is with having two DNS entries.  Then with two WINS
> you would probably want a Push/Pull Partnership setup with them and I have
> seen that not always work so smoothly either.  Then you don't really need
> the redundancy with WINS like you do DNS because it just isn't that
> critical,... nor does it even really provided redundancy quite like DNS
> with AD replication does anyway,..I've probably seen as much inconsistancy
> and conflicts between two WINS databases as I have agreement.   And lastly
> a single WINS will easly and fairly quickly rebuild it self if lost,....I
> have deleted corrupt databases and they rebuilt themselves quite quickly.
>
>
> --
> Phillip Windell


All your points sound good to me.

I'm just wondering with the poster's VLAN routing between switch ports if
there is anything being blocked.

Ace
Author
10 Jun 2009 5:28 PM
Phillip Windell
"Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org>
wrote in message news:ORBi8se6JHA.1568@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> I'm just wondering with the poster's VLAN routing between switch ports if
> there is anything being blocked.

Could be.  A lot of messes are created with ACLs in the name of "security".
I suppose the router would log that if it was.

--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Author
10 Jun 2009 7:28 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"Phillip Windell" <philwind***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Oq2BqDf6JHA.1716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org>
> wrote in message news:ORBi8se6JHA.1568@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
>> I'm just wondering with the poster's VLAN routing between switch ports if
>> there is anything being blocked.
>
> Could be.  A lot of messes are created with ACLs in the name of
> "security". I suppose the router would log that if it was.


Good point, depending on the switch vendor the VLANs are created on if
syslogging is available or enabled on it. Let's hope to hear back from the
poster to see how far he has taken it on his end to troubleshoot it.

Ace
Author
11 Jun 2009 6:51 PM
marcin via WinServerKB.com
We use Cisco switches and routers around here. I checked the config on the
router connecting VLANs A and B, and there are no ACLs between them. Any
pointers as far as what kind of packets I should be looking for in network
packet captures? I am going to collect traffic on both VLANs to see if that
will help me getting to the bottom of this problem.

Regards
Marcin

Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] wrote:
>>> I'm just wondering with the poster's VLAN routing between switch ports if
>>> there is anything being blocked.
>>
>> Could be.  A lot of messes are created with ACLs in the name of
>> "security". I suppose the router would log that if it was.
>
>Good point, depending on the switch vendor the VLANs are created on if
>syslogging is available or enabled on it. Let's hope to hear back from the
>poster to see how far he has taken it on his end to troubleshoot it.
>
>Ace

Author
11 Jun 2009 7:59 PM
Phillip Windell
"marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
news:9773fd06212c3@uwe...
>Any
> pointers as far as what kind of packets I should be looking for in network
> packet captures? I am going to collect traffic on both VLANs to see if
> that
> will help me getting to the bottom of this problem.

Nothing from me.  I can't remember the last time I ever opened a "packet
sniffer".  I can almost always solve problems without ever staring myself
blind at packet captures.  It's probably been 3 or 4 years since I ever used
a "packet sniffer" for any "real" reason.  There is just too many other
"higher level"  ways of solving problems to mess with that as far as I am
concerned.

--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Author
11 Jun 2009 10:54 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
news:9773fd06212c3@uwe...
> We use Cisco switches and routers around here. I checked the config on the
> router connecting VLANs A and B, and there are no ACLs between them. Any
> pointers as far as what kind of packets I should be looking for in network
> packet captures? I am going to collect traffic on both VLANs to see if
> that
> will help me getting to the bottom of this problem.
>
> Regards
> Marcin

WINS uses port 42 traffic. NetBIOS uses 139. NetBIOS broadcasts are stopped
on a router by default, which is fine, but when one machine queries WINS, it
uses TCP 42.

Ace
Author
12 Jun 2009 1:38 AM
Bill Grant
Show quote Hide quote
"Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org>
wrote in message news:u6xrKeu6JHA.5756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
> news:9773fd06212c3@uwe...
>> We use Cisco switches and routers around here. I checked the config on
>> the
>> router connecting VLANs A and B, and there are no ACLs between them. Any
>> pointers as far as what kind of packets I should be looking for in
>> network
>> packet captures? I am going to collect traffic on both VLANs to see if
>> that
>> will help me getting to the bottom of this problem.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marcin
>
> WINS uses port 42 traffic. NetBIOS uses 139. NetBIOS broadcasts are
> stopped on a router by default, which is fine, but when one machine
> queries WINS, it uses TCP 42.
>
> Ace
>
>
>

   And the best way to debug browser problems is still the NT utility
browstat.
Author
12 Jun 2009 2:56 AM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message
news:eTAqV5v6JHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>   And the best way to debug browser problems is still the NT utility
> browstat.
>

I agree. Great tool.

Ace
Author
12 Jun 2009 12:07 PM
marcin via WinServerKB.com
I use browstat for troubleshooting. I posted the error messages from that
tool in my original message. Hopefully, I will have some packet captures to
look at later today.

Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>>   And the best way to debug browser problems is still the NT utility
>> browstat.
>
>I agree. Great tool.
>
>Ace

Author
12 Jun 2009 10:37 PM
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
"marcin via WinServerKB.com" <u52472@uwe> wrote in message
news:977d081d6521b@uwe...
>I use browstat for troubleshooting. I posted the error messages from that
> tool in my original message. Hopefully, I will have some packet captures
> to
> look at later today.


Sorry about that. Re-reading the original post, I see you are getting an
access denial message from VlanB to VlanA trying to find the master browser.
The master browser is normally the PDC Emulator in the domain. I assume that
DC with that role is on VlanA.

You're router is allowing all traffic. Good.
The domain master browser, as I mentioned, is the PDC Emulator. HOwever if
the infrastructure is segmented, each segment will elect a master browser.
The winner is determined by the operating system type and version. Obviously
a 2003 server will win over a 2000 server, and a 2003 DC will win over a
2003 member server.

The domain master will collect info from each master browser from each
subnet to assemble a browse list that any machine requesting it, will show
you a compiled list in Network Neighborhood. If the machines in VlanB are
workstations, and are constantly restarted or not on, they will be
constantly vying for browse master of the segment, and will give you
unexpected results. I had a customer awhile back with a similar issue with a
segmented LAN with 100 workstations, no servers. They were shutdown each
night, sometimes restarted during the day, etc, so it was constantly
changing the network neighborhood list of machines. I suggested to throw any
old server over there to see what happens, not even a WINS server, just any,
and it worked for them. Workstations are not the best for a segment's master
browser.

Going through the original post, you didn't mention if a DC or some other
type of server is on the other VLAN. Is there one, or are they all
workstations?
I assume NetBIOS is not disabled on any machine?
Have any lmhosts files been changed with any additions on any machine?
And I assume there are not firewall running on the workstations on VlanB if
there are no servers?

I hope that helps to get a better handle of what's going on or what may be
contributing to what's going on.

Looking forward to what you find in the captures.

Ace

Bookmark and Share