Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Do I need defragment on server running RAID 5?

Author
19 Nov 2007 7:59 PM
Bobson
Hi everyone,

I would like to ask if I need to run the defragment on a server running RAID
5 (hardware)?

If so, have anyone tried the 3rd party like Diskkeeper? Any comments?

Also, no matter what I used to defragment, would that mess up the Shadow
Copy on the data or the config on the server? I just read thru some posts
here so I ask this one.

Thank you very much in advance for your help!

Bobson

Author
19 Nov 2007 8:19 PM
SBS Rocker
I use diskeeper om my RAID5 array with no problems.

Show quoteHide quote
"Bobson" <Bob***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:18D9A039-0860-480C-A0E2-25BC1CBFFFF5@microsoft.com...
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if I need to run the defragment on a server running
> RAID
> 5 (hardware)?
>
> If so, have anyone tried the 3rd party like Diskkeeper? Any comments?
>
> Also, no matter what I used to defragment, would that mess up the Shadow
> Copy on the data or the config on the server? I just read thru some posts
> here so I ask this one.
>
> Thank you very much in advance for your help!
>
> Bobson
>
>
Are all your drivers up to date? click for free checkup

Author
21 Nov 2007 2:27 PM
Aevin
The latest versions of Diskeeper are VSS compatible according to their website:
http://tinyurl.com/ywuauz -- Aevin Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway
Author
21 Nov 2007 5:13 PM
Bobson
THank you for all your  response. But do you think if I really need to have
to program to maintain the disk fragment issue?

Show quoteHide quote
"Aevin" wrote:

>
> The latest versions of Diskeeper are VSS compatible according to their
> website:
> http://tinyurl.com/ywuauz
>
>
> --
> Aevin
> Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway
>
>
Author
21 Nov 2007 5:30 PM
SBS Rocker
Either that or you do a "monthly" maintenance and run chkdsk.

Show quoteHide quote
"Bobson" <Bob***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:89B72DD0-3E7C-4922-8BFC-91F869422424@microsoft.com...
> THank you for all your  response. But do you think if I really need to
> have
> to program to maintain the disk fragment issue?
>
> "Aevin" wrote:
>
>>
>> The latest versions of Diskeeper are VSS compatible according to their
>> website:
>> http://tinyurl.com/ywuauz
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aevin
>> Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway
>>
>>
Author
21 Nov 2007 5:44 PM
Bobson
Thank you SBS Rocker!

In fact, in my career life, I never defragment any file servers... Usually I
only did it on desktops...

How do I know when the disk needs defragment (rather than just run the tool
in the disk mgmt in Manage)?

Show quoteHide quote
"SBS Rocker" wrote:

> Either that or you do a "monthly" maintenance and run chkdsk.
>
> "Bobson" <Bob***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:89B72DD0-3E7C-4922-8BFC-91F869422424@microsoft.com...
> > THank you for all your  response. But do you think if I really need to
> > have
> > to program to maintain the disk fragment issue?
> >
> > "Aevin" wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The latest versions of Diskeeper are VSS compatible according to their
> >> website:
> >> http://tinyurl.com/ywuauz
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Aevin
> >> Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Author
21 Nov 2007 10:14 PM
DevilsPGD
In message <uFp$8QGLIHA.2***@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> "SBS Rocker"
<nore***@NoDomain.com> wrote:

>Either that or you do a "monthly" maintenance and run chkdsk.

What does a chkdsk have to do with defragmenting?
Author
26 Nov 2007 6:43 PM
Aevin
Chkdsk checks for file system integrity before a defrag, so that the chance of messing up data during a defrag due to file system errors, is minimized. If a volume is not alright, then a defrag won't most likely run on it until it's been fixed. (chkdsk /f). It's a good idea to run chkdsk if you suspect something is wrong, or if you haven't run one in a long time.

Reg. when to defrag, you have to run the analysis from the built-in defragmenter, decide whether you need to defrag and schedule a defrag job for the relevant volumes, or run them manually.

For automatic defraggers, the analysis is automatically done in the background, and if necessary, defragmentation occurs, again automatically, when there are sufficient free system resources to do so i.e. usually when idling. Over the long term, this is a more efficient and effective solution compared to the manual/scheduled defrag IMHO. YMMV. -- Aevin Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway

Bookmark and Share